As we enter the final stretch of the 112th Congress, HSLF is posting a preview of our 2012 Humane Scorecard. In this preliminary report, we evaluate lawmakers’ performance on animal protection issues by scoring a number of key votes, but also their support for adequate funding for the enforcement of animal welfare laws, and their cosponsorship of priority bills. Building the number of cosponsors on a bill is an important way to show that there is a critical mass of bipartisan support for the policy, and help push the legislation over the finish line. Already in the last few weeks, we’ve seen a dramatic jump in the cosponsor counts for each of these bills, and we need to keep the momentum going with your help.
The egg industry reform bill has 150 cosponsors in the House and 18 in the Senate; the legislation on chimpanzees in invasive research has 173 cosponsors in the House and 16 in the Senate; the animal fighting spectator bill has 218 in the House, and it secured 88 Senate votes when the measure came up as an amendment to the Farm Bill; and the puppy mill legislation has 209 cosponsors in the House and 33 in the Senate. These are very impressive numbers, and they show the strength of our cause and our grassroots support.
Congress will only be in town a few more days before they break until after the election. So please today call your U.S. senators and U.S. representative and urge them to cosponsor the three animal protection bills in the Senate and four in the House that are being counted on the 2012 Humane Scorecard. If they decide to join on and they let us know this week before they break for the election, they’ll receive credit on the final Humane Scorecard for the 112th Congress.
You can look up your federal legislators here, and then call the congressional switchboard at (202) 224-3121 to be connected to each of your legislators. Ask them to join as cosponsors of the following animal protection bills. If they’re already cosponsoring all these bills, please call and thank them for their strong support.
Eggs and Hen Housing—Cosponsorship of S. 3239 and H.R. 3798, the Egg Products Inspection Act Amendments of 2012—introduced by Sen. Feinstein and Reps. Schrader, Gallegly, Farr, and Denham—to provide for a uniform national standard for the housing and treatment of egg-laying hens, phased in over a period of 15-18 years, that will significantly improve animal welfare and provide a stable and secure future for U.S. egg farmers. The legislation is supported by the egg industry and animal welfare groups, and does not affect any other livestock sector or food product, other than eggs. Under this legislation, each laying hen will ultimately be provided nearly double the amount of current space, along with enrichments such as nest boxes and perches that permit hens to better express natural behaviors. Egg farmers will be able to invest in these enriched colony cage systems with the assurance that they will face regulatory certainty and not a patchwork of conflicting state laws—helping industry at no cost to the federal government (the preliminary cost projection by the Congressional Budget Office is zero). Studies have shown higher productivity for hens in enriched colony cage systems (more eggs, lower hen mortality). Also, an economic study by the independent research group Agralytica concluded that under the bill, egg prices would likely increase by less than 2 cents per dozen, and that would be mostly in the out years. If the federal bill doesn’t pass, egg prices may well be higher in the future as the industry deals with conflicting state law requirements that cause disruption to the industry nationwide. Consumers support this legislation by a margin of 4-to-1, and it has been endorsed by leading consumer organizations, as well as by the American Veterinary Medical Association and many others (see the full list here). Cage-free and free-range systems, as well as operations with fewer than 3,000 laying hens, will be unaffected by S. 3239/H.R. 3798, except that they may see increased sales as consumers are able to more clearly distinguish what’s available on store shelves, thanks to the bill’s labeling provisions. See responses to frequently asked questions.
Chimpanzees Warehoused in Laboratories—Cosponsorship of S. 810 and H.R. 1513, the Great Ape Protection and Cost Savings Act—introduced by Sens. Cantwell, Collins, and Sanders, and Reps. Bartlett, Israel, Reichert, Langevin, and Towns—to phase out use of chimpanzees in invasive research, retire the approximately 500 federally-owned chimpanzees to sanctuary, and make the current NIH moratorium on government-funded breeding of chimpanzees statutory. Chimpanzees have proven to be poor research models for human diseases, so at any given time, about 80-90% of chimps in U.S. labs are not used in research, but simply warehoused in barren and costly laboratory cages at taxpayer expense. It’s much less expensive to care for chimpanzees at sanctuaries (where they live with other chimps in a natural setting) than to warehouse them individually in labs; this legislation is estimated to save American taxpayers $250 million over ten years. This legislation is also consistent with the December 2011 report by the National Academies’ Institute of Medicine, which could not identify a single area of research in which chimpanzees are necessary.
Animal Fighting Spectators—(Scorecard is only counting cosponsors of this in the House; in the Senate, we’re instead counting the 88-11 floor vote that approved parallel language offered by Sen. Vitter as an amendment to the Farm Bill.) Cosponsorship of H.R. 2492, the Animal Fighting Spectator Prohibition Act—introduced by Reps. Marino and Sutton—to establish misdemeanor penalties for knowingly attending an organized animal fight and felony penalties for bringing a minor to such a fight. Members also receive credit if they voted in favor of a related amendment, offered by Rep. McGovern, to the Farm Bill, which passed in the House Agriculture Committee (the Farm Bill has not yet been considered by the full House). While Congress has strengthened the federal animal fighting law in recent years, this legislation will close a remaining gap: prohibiting attendance, as 49 states have done, and helping take the profit out of animal fighting. Spectators are more than mere observers at animal fights. They are participants and accomplices who enable the crime, paying hundreds or thousands of dollars in admission fees and gambling wagers, and helping conceal organizers and handlers who try to blend into the crowd when a raid occurs. This legislation is widely supported by more than 280 national, state and local law enforcement agencies (covering all 50 states), including the Fraternal Order of Police and the Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association. The preliminary CBO estimate on this legislation is also zero.
Puppy Mills—Cosponsorship of S. 707 and H.R. 835, the Puppy Uniform Protection and Safety (PUPS) Act—introduced by Sens. Durbin and Vitter, and Reps. Gerlach, Farr, Bill Young, and Capps—to crack down on abusive "puppy mills" in the United States, where breeding dogs are often stacked in wire cages for years to produce litter after litter. The legislation will close a loophole in the Animal Welfare Act by requiring that commercial breeders who sell 50 or more puppies per year online and directly to the public be licensed and inspected, just as breeders who supply to pet stores already must be. It will also require that dogs used for breeding at commercial facilities be provided the opportunity to exercise daily.
